Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Thu Feb 01 15_47_41 CST 2001
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

MEH:ddj
Docket No: 3692-99
8 September 1999

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 8 September 1999. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 5420 PERS 913 of 13 August 1999, a copy of
which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND

5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE

MILLINGTON TN 3805 5-0000

5420
PERS 913
13 Aug 99

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION

OF NAVAL RECORDS

Via:

Assistant for BCNR Matters (Pers-OOZCB/NPC-OOZCB)

Subj:

RE

~R INFORMATION IN THE CASE OF

End:

(1) BUPERS memo 5420 Pers-OOZCB of 21 Jul 99

Enclosure (1) is forwarded with the following comments and

1.
recommendations:

a.

We do not support ~1

1tI~lt~I~etition.After careful
review of the documents provided and hisi~*I~lEil~*~service
record we find no evidence that he drilled after March 1987.
As
best we can determine his record of military service is accurate
and does not warrant modification.

Additional questions may be directed to PNC(SW) Velazquez at

2.
(901) 874-4502

C. B. LAPORTE
Director, Naval Reserve Personnel
Administration Division



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08045-00

    Original file (08045-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 March 2001. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 5420 PERS 862 undated, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01806-01

    Original file (01806-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 June 2001. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 5420 PERS 913 of 17 May 2001, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 01725-98

    Original file (01725-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by giving him retirement point credit for his Naval Reserve participation during the period 10 August 1959 to 12 March 1962. The Board, consisting of Ms. Davies and Messrs. McCulloch and Molzahn, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 5 August 1999, and pursuant to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07022-02

    Original file (07022-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 Janaury 2003. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Per reference (a), the following recommendation and comments are...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04382-01

    Original file (04382-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 MEH:ddj Docket No: 4382-01 25 September 2001 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Your allegations of error and A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on injustice were reviewed in...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Wed Sep 20 10_49_23 CDT 2000

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. not all applicants are offered the NCF Program.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03190-99

    Original file (03190-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The program-may have been referring to is the Navy College Fund (NCF) Program.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08670-98

    Original file (08670-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 06586-98

    Original file (06586-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 June 1999. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY WAVY P E R I O W W U C O Y Y A N D 5720 IWTE9RWY DRIVE MILLIWOTON I N 38055-0000 1830 Pers823 Ser 45 1 1 Jun 1999 Subj: COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ICO - Ref: (a) Pers-OOXCB ltr of 3 1 March 1999 NAVAL RECORDS Encl: (1) BCNR File with Microfiche Service Record MEMORANDUM...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 05214-98

    Original file (05214-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 12 and 16 April 1999, copies of which are attached. Until 1 September 1995, as a member of the Ready Reserve, and as such, W= be considered by promotion - - selection boards. A complete review of Lieutenant Commander record reveals that there were no properly considered during either failure of selection per reference (c).